The Great
Thanksgiving Hoax
by Richard J.
Maybury
Each year at this time school children all over America are
taught the official Thanksgiving story, and newspapers, radio, TV,
and magazines devote vast amounts of time and space to it. It is
all very colorful and fascinating.
It is also very deceiving. This official story is nothing like
what really happened. It is a fairy tale, a whitewashed and
sanitized collection of half-truths which divert attention away
from Thanksgiving's real meaning.
The official story has the pilgrims boarding the Mayflower,
coming to America and establishing the Plymouth
colony in the winter of 1620-21. This first winter is hard,
and half the colonists die. But the survivors are hard working and
tenacious, and they learn new farming techniques from the Indians.
The harvest of 1621 is bountiful. The Pilgrims hold a celebration,
and give thanks to God. They are grateful for the wonderful new
abundant land He has given them.
The official story then has the Pilgrims living more or less
happily ever after, each year repeating the first Thanksgiving.
Other early colonies also have hard times at first, but they soon
prosper and adopt the annual tradition of giving thanks for this
prosperous new land called America.
The problem with this official story is that the harvest of
1621 was not bountiful, nor were the colonists hardworking or
tenacious. 1621 was a famine year and many of the colonists were
lazy thieves.
In his 'History
of Plymouth Plantation,' the governor of the colony,
William Bradford, reported that the colonists went hungry for
years, because they refused to work in the fields. They preferred
instead to steal food. He says the colony was riddled with
"corruption," and with "confusion and discontent." The crops were
small because "much was stolen both by night and day, before it
became scarce eatable."
In the harvest feasts of 1621 and 1622, "all had their hungry
bellies filled," but only briefly. The prevailing condition during
those years was not the abundance the official story claims, it
was famine and death. The first "Thanksgiving" was not so much a
celebration as it was the last meal of condemned men.
But in subsequent years something changes. The harvest of 1623
was different. Suddenly, "instead of famine now God gave them
plenty," Bradford wrote, "and the face of things was changed, to
the rejoicing of the hearts of many, for which they blessed God."
Thereafter, he wrote, "any general want or famine hath not been
amongst them since to this day." In fact, in 1624, so much food
was produced that the colonists were able to begin exporting
corn.
What happened?
After the poor harvest of 1622, writes Bradford, "they began to
think how they might raise as much corn as they could, and obtain
a better crop." They began to question their form of economic
organization.
This had required that "all profits & benefits that are got
by trade, working, fishing, or any other means" were to be placed
in the common stock of the colony, and that, "all such persons as
are of this colony, are to have their meat, drink, apparel, and
all provisions out of the common stock." A person was to put into
the common stock all he could, and take out only what he
needed.
This "from each according to his ability, to each according to
his need" was an early form of socialism, and it is why the
Pilgrims were starving. Bradford writes that "young men that are
most able and fit for labor and service" complained about being
forced to "spend their time and strength to work for other men's
wives and children." Also, "the strong, or man of parts, had no
more in division of victuals and clothes, than he that was weak."
So the young and strong refused to work and the total amount of
food produced was never adequate.
To rectify this situation, in 1623 Bradford abolished
socialism. He gave each household a parcel of land and told them
they could keep what they produced, or trade it away as they saw
fit. In other words, he replaced socialism with a free market, and
that was the end of famines.
Many early groups of colonists set up socialist states, all
with the same terrible results. At Jamestown, established in 1607,
out of every shipload of settlers that arrived, less than half
would survive their first twelve months in America. Most of the
work was being done by only one-fifth of the men, the other
four-fifths choosing to be parasites. In the winter of 1609-10,
called "The Starving Time," the population fell from five-hundred
to sixty.
Then the Jamestown colony was converted to a free market, and
the results were every bit as dramatic as those at Plymouth. In
1614, Colony Secretary Ralph Hamor wrote that after the switch
there was "plenty of food, which every man by his own industry may
easily and doth procure." He said that when the socialist system
had prevailed, "we reaped not so much corn from the labors of
thirty men as three men have done for themselves now."
Before these free markets were established, the colonists had
nothing for which to be thankful. They were in the same situation
as Ethiopians are today, and for the same reasons. But after free
markets were established, the resulting abundance was so dramatic
that the annual Thanksgiving celebrations became common throughout
the colonies, and in 1863, Thanksgiving became a national
holiday.
Thus the real reason for Thanksgiving, deleted from the
official story, is: Socialism does not work; the one and only
source of abundance is free markets, and we thank God we live in a
country where we can have them. * * * * * Mr. Maybury
writes on investments.
This article originally appeared in The Free Market,
November 1985. Go here to subscribe
or unsubscribe.
|